eSchool News Report:For anyone doing research online, the abundance of information available can be overwhelming--and so can the task of sifting out unreliable information. Now, a pair of researchers hopes to give students a method for assessing the reliability of material they find on the internet, whether it's in Wikipedia articles, YouTube videos, or blogs.
In a paper they recently presented at a teaching symposium, English professor Susan Miller-Cochran (North Carolina State U.) and Rochelle Rodrigo (Mesa Community College in Arizona), suggest that students be given a sort of checklist to explore as they consider online--and offline--texts.
The two main questions they encourage students to ask are: How does the information change over time--is it constantly updated and revised, or static? And, how has the information been reviewed?
The professors' published guideline is formatted as a matrix of questions aimed at helping students decipher what should be used in a research project and what should be ignored. The guide asks if sources are "continuously changeable through repeat performances or revisions," "reviewed by someone with authority or certification prior to publication," and "published and revised by the author." It also prompts students to question if the material was reviewed by other experts in the same profession.
Often, as in the case of Wikipedia, which has elements of peer review as well as self-publication, the answers can get murky. But Miller-Cochran says the end goal is for students to learn how to analyze texts without "pigeonholing the material based on where it was found."
*Although today's students are much more likely to begin their research online, Miller-Cochran said students still often perceive the articles, charts, and data found in books as more authoritative than online information.
